|
SYSTEMIC STUFF ( + occasional nonsense ) IN THE NEWS . . . . DECONSTRUCTED FOR POSSIBLE MUTUAL BENEFIT
|
MEMES |
![]() Caspian challengePlease note : The following information has been assembled from many different sources, which may, or may not be up to date, or accurate. The author is not petrochemical expert, and does not have access to data which would allow a 100% accurate picture to be realised. It was originally produced for personal use, to clarify, as far as possible, what's going on in the region - because we weren't able to find any overall clear picture elsewhere. The text and map is intended solely as an aid to further discussion. Having said that, we're reasonably confident that most of the important details, at least, are correct. If anyone finds any mistakes or errors in the data, please e-mail us, and we'll update things accordingly. Here is a list of some of the petrochemical companies which are, or were, involved in prospecting for oil and gas in the Caspian area. This list alone gives a good idea of the scale of the operations in the area. Arranged by country.
Japex JAPAN Tpao TURKEY Whitehall UK Aioc AZERBAIJAN Nations Energy KAZAKHSTAN Petronas MALAYSIA TCO CONSORTIUM Delta SAUDI Lukoil RUSSIA Lukagip RUSSIA/ITALY Partex PORTUGAL Oman oil OMAN Petrom ROMANIA JKX UKRAINE Lasmo PAKISTAN Dragon UAE Pado AUSTRIA TotalFinaElf FRANCE Statoil NORWAY Oiec IRAN Shell NETHERLANDS Repsol SPAIN Wintershall GERMANY Commonweath AUSTRALIA National Petroleum SWITZERLAND Grunwald (not known)
Your challenge ( should you choose to accept it ) is to find ways of exporting the product from the region without going through countries which might be 'problematic', or against which your own country has trade sanctions. ( e.g. the US's sanctions against Iran )
The existing pipes are shown in blue, and the proposed pipelines are shown in red
As is evident, two of the countries which would, until recently have been considered 'very problematic' - no longer are ( in theory ). If you wanted to ship the product Westwards e.g. to the UK or US, a pipeline to a Mediterranean port would be ideal. If you wanted to go Eastwards e.g. towards Japan, a port in the Gulf would, perhaps, be more convenient. One of the reasons the map was produced was to try to get a handle on which countries might be heavily featuring in global news reports over the next few years . . . Countries which may shortly find themselves in the position whereby : Compliance = pipeline royalties. Non-compliance = big, big, trouble.
|
|